Monday, December 31, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 43

Aaron and I cap off the year with one more BS episode.  This time, we talk about anime.  We talk about what constitutes an anime, what distinguishes anime from non-anime, what even is an "anime style," what shows got anime rolling here in America, a little bit about English dubs, and some good anime series or movies to start out with if you haven't watched anime before.

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support the podcast, click here.

Anime and other shows mentioned in the episode

Cowboy Bebop
Full Metal Alchemist
Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z
Mushi-shi
Interstella 5555
Porter Robinson's Shelter music video
Avatar: The Last Airbender
Voltron
Princess Mononoke
Pokemon
Robotech
Attack on Titan
And much more!

Sunday, December 30, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 42

Aaron gives his thoughts on the sudden and tragic death of Bre Payton, the former staff writer for The Federalist.

Listen to the episode here.

Sunday, December 23, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 41

Aaron and I are going to focus on less politically, socially, and philosophically heavy things in the rest of the episodes this year.  It's break time, so we want to take it easy.  That doesn't mean those topics won't come out of our mouths though.

Aaron and I are all over the place in this episode.  We talk about the Aquaman movie, which Aaron recently watched, superhero movies in general, the Gospel, some apologetics, our thoughts on Ben Shapiro's interview with John MacArthur, stuff about the spiritual vs. the psychological, and more.

Listen to the episode here.

If you are interested in supporting our show, find out how here.

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 40

This is the first in a line of episodes that we are calling BS episodes.  In this episode, Aaron and I start with a brief update on our lives and then get self-indulgent and talk for almost 3 hours about our favorite hobby: video games.  We talk a little bit about the ethics of video game playing and some of the issues with playing a lot of video games, but we mostly talk about our favorite video games, video game news, some strange Bible-based video games that exist, and video game recommendations.

Listen to the episode here.

Some (but not all) of the games mentioned in the episode

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time and Majora's Mask
Chrono Trigger
Shenmue
Super Metroid
Hollow Knight
Metal Gear Solid series
Bloodborne
Dark Souls
Some weird Bible games
Warframe
And many more!


Friday, December 7, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 39

Aaron's Description of the Episode

Brian Godawa came back (I know...we're just as baffled by our repeat guests as everyone else is, but bafflement and gratitude are not only not mutually exclusive but complementary) and we talk about eschatology, dispensationalism, the awesomeness of the Bible, but most importantly for present purposes his latest series of books! The Chronicles of the Apocalypse tells a tale of epic proportions concerning the destruction of the temple in AD 70, the monstrous Nero, the persecution of the fledgling Christ followers, and the true battles going on in the heavenly realms that effect our world to this day. Go buy these books as Christmas presents and maybe Godawa will return (or strike back) on our humble pod some day! But seriously go buy his stuff. He's a good dude who writes good stuff: amzn.to/2RBxmVz 

We're getting pretty desperate to find ways to meet our last 8 episodes so after this one the quality will be going down significantly (merry Christmas). Aaron may even do a couple episodes where he just reads old articles and does some commentary on them. This will be a sad attempt to straighten out some of the more complicated ideas for his alleged book project (cough, everybody needs dreams, cough).


Listen to the episode here.

Wednesday, November 28, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 38

Aaron's description of the new episode.

Aaron interviews bestselling author Brian Godawa and they discuss the weird stuff in the Bible. Brian has written several series of "Theological Novels" (Aaron, in his characteristically pretentious style describes them as "Didactic Christian Myth") which explore the more bizarre (but scholarly accurate) aspects of the Old Testament. We discuss the book of Enoch, Giants, Angels, Demons, and other aspects of what Dr. Michael Heiser calls the Deuteronomy 32 worldview. Even the Epic of Gilgamesh comes up at one point. Godawa's first series is entitled The Chronicles of the Nephilim. His latest series, The Chronicles of the Apocalypse, is a kind of antidote to the Left Behind craze by focusing on distinctly preterist eschatology which teaches that John's Apocalypse mostly concerns events in the later 1st century AD. But eschatology (one of Aaron's favorite subjects, yet one Kyle remains willfully and lazily ignorant of) will concern our next episode with Godawa. Kyle is absent from this episode and the next one. Aaron put him in a box to repent of his eschatological ignorance. He won't be allowed back until he's completed all of Jurgen Moltmann's books, and he has to read them in the original Klingon.

Check out Brian Godawa's stuff on Amazon and godawa.com

We mention Michael Heiser quite a bit. Check him out at drmsh.com

And for those of you who are counting down we only have about 30 days left to get out 9 episodes! 


Listen to the episode here.

Sunday, November 4, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 37

I interviewed Raymond Blaine Stewart (Ph.D candidate in philosophy at the University of Oklahoma) on the topic of singleness in the church, the gift of singleness, what 1 Corinthians 7 teaches about singleness, and how churches can effectively minister to the single people in its congregation.  Raymond's audio sounds a bit distant in the beginning, but it gets better after a few minutes, so don't worry.

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Books Mentioned in the Show

Getting Serious about Getting Married by Debbie Maken.

Saturday, November 3, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 36

This is part two of our conversation.  In this episode, Aaron and I go through a "white fragility" test by Ally Henny, answer the questions, and give our thoughts on things like white fragility, privilege, racial issues, and the like.  Do Aaron and I exhibit "white fragility?"  Do you?  Take the test with us!

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Books Mentioned in this Episode

Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions by Gregory Koukl.

The Freedom of Self-Forgetfulness by Timothy Keller.

Other Sources Mentioned on the Show

The Argument with Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg, and David Leonhardt

Friday, November 2, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 35

Aaron and I ended up recording for over two hours, so I divided that recording into two episodes.  This is part one.  In this episode, Aaron and I give brief updates on our lives and Aaron talks about some interesting things he's learned from Dr. Hellerman about the ancient world's and early church's view on poverty and homelessness and how that applies to today.

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Books Mentioned in the Episode

Early Christian Care for the Poor by K.C. Richardson.

The Coddling of the American Mind by Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff.

Them: Why We Hate Each Other and How to Heal by Ben Sasse.

12 Rules for Life by Jordan Peterson.

You are Not Your Brain by Jeffrey Schwartz and Rebecca Gladding.

Saturday, October 20, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 34

Aaron and Kyle talk about "woke" Christianity, social justice, critical theory, intersectionality, and their compatibility with the Christian worldview.  We get into issues of politics, freedom, the Gospel, and some book recommendations.

Listen to the episode here.

McArthur's social justice statement.

Find the Neil Shenvi articles cited on the show here and here.

Click here to learn how to support our show.

Thursday, October 4, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 33

Aaron and Kyle discuss some logical, apologetic, and epistemological issues that are brought up by the Kavanaugh case.  The reliability of eyewitness testimony and memory, how that applies to the Gospels, thoughts on "believe all women," and more are discussed.

Listen to the episode here.

If you want to support our show, click here to learn how.

Saturday, September 22, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 32

Aaron and Kyle talk about some recent controversies surrounding the famous preacher and apologist, Ravi Zacharias, and his academic credentials and experiences.

Listen to the episode here.

Click here for the article by Randal Rauser.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Thursday, September 20, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 31

In today's episode, Timothy Hsiao (Ph.D candidate in philosophy at the University of Reading) returns for a third interview.  This time, we talk about the ethics of immigration.  Why is illegal immigration impermissible?  What laws should change?  What about compassion and love?

Listen to the episode here.

Listen to my other interviews with Hsiao: Episodes 25 and 26.

For more from Hsiao, including his articles, go to his website.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Tuesday, September 11, 2018

What is the Point of Debating Online?

I came across this picture on FB that I think makes a very good point.  



Earlier this year, I was debating abortion with some people on my FB page and I was in several other debates on that topic over the period of a couple of months. During that time many people have said to me that we should just ignore pro-choice commenters, especially ones that are more emotional and do not give cogent arguments. They won't be convinced, so what's the point debating them? Not everybody says this, but it is something I hear relatively often.  Sometimes, you hear cynical people in any controversial discussion say "What is the point in arguing about this?!  No one is going to change their mind!"
I definitely understand that issue. It is very unlikely that they will be convinced by any arguments we give on this platform. In my experience, they often just repeat the same things over and over again without considering what my pro-life friends or I argue. I do, however, think that entering these debates with pro-choicers on FB is a worthwhile endeavor. I don't necessarily enter these debates to convince these people, though it would be nice if they were convinced. Here is why I engage them
1) It may at least help them understand why people are pro-life beyond "You just want to control women's bodies!"
2) It may help them become pro-life ten years from now.
3) It helps a brother out. If a friend of mine is debating the abortion issue with multiple people, I don't want to leave him alone. I want to help him out. I also appreciate it if people help me out and don't leave me alone.
4) I don't want these people to be so confident in their assertions. I don't want them to get away with saying what they want without being challenged.
5) The audience may be genuinely helped and educated by seeing your contribution to the debate.
I'm not saying that all pro-choicers are bad arguers or closed-minded. I am also not saying that there aren't legitimate times avoid engaging with some people. I just don't like the categorical charge that engaging them is always pointless because they won't be convinced.  This doesn't just go for the abortion debate.  This applies to any topic of debate online.  

Thursday, August 30, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 30

Kyle interviews Daniel Vargas, a software engineer and immigrant from Venezuela, on socialism and the state of Venezuela under socialism.  What is Socialism?  What role did it play in Venezuela's decline?  Is Capitalism any better?  What should Christians think of political theories like Socialism and Capitalism?

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support our podcast, go here.

Friday, August 24, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 29

Kyle interviews Neal Hardin on Assembly Bill 2943 in California and sexual orientation change therapy.  This is a bill being passed around in California, but listeners who are not citizens of California should care about this topic because of the freedoms it could affect.  We talk about what the bill says, Neal's concerns with the bill, and the nuances of orientation change therapy.

Listen to the episode here.

For more from Neal Hardin, check out his website.

To learn how to support the show, click here.

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Apologist Recommendation: Edward Feser

In this series, I will recommend certain scholars and apologists to our readers and listeners.  These are people that I believe are worth listening to because they are informed and give good arguments and insights into the subjects that they study, which helps intellectually equip Christians so that they can grow in their own faith and their outreach towards non-Christians.  I am not claiming that these scholars and apologists have everything correct, but I think they are intellectual powerhouses that we can learn much from.

Edward Feser

Dr. Feser is a Catholic philosopher who teaches at Pasadena City College.  Being a Catholic, his metaphysics is heavily influenced by Aquinas, which may make his philosophy slightly different from other well-known Christian apologists like William Lane Craig, but his material is still valuable.  A lot of his material is academic, but he has a lot of more popular-level materials that offer great arguments and insights.  Here are some of his works.

His Blog

Feser regularly writes on his blog, where you can find his thoughts on everything philosophy, theology, Catholicism, and apologetics.  This is a good place to go to introduce yourself to his material.

Atheism

Dr. Feser has a lot of scathing and often hilarious critiques of the "New Atheism" and particular atheist writers.  In book form, he wrote The Last Supertition, which is a critique of the new atheism.  His criticisms of Jerry Coyne are all entertaining to read.  He has a review of Coyne's book, Faith Versus Fact, on First Things.  You can also find his blog posts and articles critiquing Coyne here and here.  Feser also critiques Lawrence Krauss, a physicist and atheist, here.  He has a lot more material on atheism and responses to atheist apologists, so look them up.

Existence of God

Dr. Feser has also written on the arguments for the existence of God.  His new book, Five Proofs of the Existence of God, is pretty self-explanatory.  Feser is also interviewed here, where he responds to Dawkins' critiques of the arguments for God's existence in his book, The God Delusion.

Misc.

I recommend just looking through his blog for more materials.  He has a lot of articles on philosophy of mind, ethical issues like sexual ethics, abortion, and capital punishment, explanations of Catholic docrines, and much, much more.  I hope you learn a lot from his resources.

Saturday, August 18, 2018

Needs and Rights

We have been emphatic in the past that the topic of our show is not guns.  We do this as a bit of a running gag because of the name of our podcast.  The theme of our show is Christian commentary.  However, that theme is wide enough to allow for a wide variety of topics to be discussed, including the topic of guns.  It's an interesting and important topic, so it has and will likely come up in our episodes and writings.  I had an interview with a philosopher about gun rights and this article is going to be about guns.

In this article, I want to address a particular argument or phrase that people who are for more gun control like to say.  This is an argument/phrase that more sophisticated defenders of gun control probably don't use, but I do see it frequently in the popular-level discourse on social media or protests.  Because of this, I like to call it a "meme-argument."  The phrase, or question depending on how the person says it, is basically "Why do you need this?!"  There isn't really an argument here, but there are implicit premises and conclusions in there if you think about them or draw them out.  Defenders of more gun restrictions (or complete gun bans) will talk about features of certain guns, like the AR-15, and say that there is no reason to have a gun like that because you don't need those features for whatever purpose.  The question is: What conclusion is supposed to be drawn from this?  For this post, I'm going to focus on the AR-15 since that's the gun I usually see being referred to when I hear this.

First, we need to figure out what they mean when they say that we don't need an AR-15 because of whatever features it has.  Are they saying 1) that we shouldn't have that gun or are they saying 2) that the gun is unnecessary, so there's no reason to have one?

The conclusion of (1) does not follow.  The fact that something is not needed has no bearing on whether or not it should be legal to obtain or whether or not is it moral to own.  If you want to argue those conclusions, you need to do more work than that.

If they mean (2), that its unnecessary, then I agree, but that doesn't mean that the gun isn't sufficient.  What I mean by this is that, yes, you do not need an AR-15 over other guns.  You could have a shotgun, a glock, a beretta, or any number of other guns.  However, the AR-15, like any other gun, still does the trick.  It still does what a person who wants a gun wants the gun to do: it provides a means of self-defense and recreation.  So, the fact that an AR-15 is unnecessary does not mean there is no reason to own one.

This article is not an all-out refutation of arguments for more gun control.  I am showing that this meme-argument, like all others, is insufficient to give any good reason for that viewpoint.  People at the popular level, even on social media, need to give more comprehensive and relevant arguments for their position that require more context and critical thought.  In the case of the phrase that I have talked about and its implicit argument, it does nothing to show that the AR-15 should be banned or that there should be more gun restrictions.  It also does nothing to address the positive arguments for less gun restriction based on a person's right to defend his or her life from danger.

Listen to the interview I linked above for the arguments for less gun ownership restrictions.

Friday, August 17, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 28

Aaron and I are back together, but this episode is definitely more somber and honest than the others.  We start out by giving our thoughts on the new scandal in the Catholic church.  We then move on to bearing our souls to our audience by talking about the pain in our lives and the things that have made things difficult for us.  I hope our honesty can help you get some perspective on your own troubles and help you realize that you are not alone in struggling with life.

Listen to the episode here.

To learn how to support our podcast, go here.

Monday, August 13, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 27

Kyle interviews Anthony Costello on his journey from Catholicism and nominal religiosity to Evangelical Protestant Christianity.  We talk about the events that lead to his current beliefs and some of his criticisms of the Catholic church.  Anthony got an M.A. in Christian Apologetics from Biola University and an M.A. in theology at Talbot School of Theology.

Listen to the episode here.

For more from Anthony, check out his website.

To learn how to support our show, click here.

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Support our Show

Good news! You can now financially support our podcast! Our episodes will always be free to listen to, but we would appreciate your help. Support from you will help us stay accountable to our standards, increase our quality, and incentivize us to keep going. If you like what we're doing, believe that our content can continue to bless you and others, and want to see more, please consider supporting us. Thank you. 

Click on the big purple "Support this Podcast" button on our Anchor profile to donate.  The picture below shows what it looks like.



Wednesday, August 8, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 26

Timothy Hsiao, a philosophy teacher at Grantham University and Ph.D candidate in philosophy at the University of Reading, returns to talk about gun rights.  Hsiao argues for a more permissive view of gun rights and ownership and criticizes arguments for more gun restrictions.

Listen to the episode here.

For Hsiao's papers on the subject of guns, check out his website.

For my first interview with him, click here.

Friday, August 3, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 25

In this episode, I interviewed Tim Hsiao, professor of philosophy at Grantham University and Ph.D candidate at the University of Reading, on the natural law theory of ethics.  What is natural law theory?  What are the arguments for and against it?  What does natural law theory say about the ethics of sex, lying, drug use, and other things?  How is God involved in natural law theory?  Check it out.

Listen to the episode here.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 24

Today, I interview Dr. Lydia McGrew on undesigned coincidences as evidence for the reliability of the Bible.  We also talk about a concerning trend in New Testament studies that Lydia calls "Literary Device" theory and the problems with it.

Listen to the episode here.

For more from Lydia, check out her writings on What's Wrong With the World and her personal blog.

For more on the topic we discussed, get her book, Hidden in Plain View.

Monday, July 30, 2018

Site Update

Look on the left side of the site.  Aaron has provided links to all of the different platforms that feature our podcast.  Now you should have easy access to the episodes on whatever platform you prefer to use.  Aaron also fixed our iTunes link, which wasn't quite right before.

Sunday, July 29, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 23

Adrian Urias returns to talk about a feminist philosophy class that he took in college.  What is feminism?  What are the philosophical presuppositions of feminism?  How do we engage with feminists?  What about feminism is compatible with Christianity?  What parts aren't compatible?  All that and more here.

Listen to the episode here.

Listen to my first interview with Adrian here.

For more from Adrian, check out his blog.

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 22

Aaron and I, prompted by an article on Quillette, talk about transgenderism and philosophy of mind issues.  This is part 1 of this topic.  We will get more into the metaphysics of mind in part 2.

Listen to the episode here.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 21

I interview Dennis Bray, a Ph.D candidate in analytic theology at the University of St. Andrews, on the metaphysics of beauty.  Is beauty objective?  Why think it is?  How does the topic of beauty relate to the topic of goodness and morality?  What is God's connection to beauty and its objectivity?  What is an argument for God's existence from beauty?  All that and more here.

Listen to the episode here.

Thursday, July 19, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 20

Aaron and I talk about a dialogue that happened between Pastor Timothy Keller and Dr. Jonathan Haidt called The Closing of the Modern Mind.  Keller and Haidt talk about living in a pluralistic society and what resources their viewpoints have to offer to help people live in and foster a pluralistic society.  Aaron and I talk about the issue of civility when living around and talking with different people, the strengths Keller has as a speaker and representative of Christ, and the problems with identity politics.

Listen to the episode here.

This is the article Aaron mentions about Jim Jefferies and Jordan Peterson

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 19

Aaron and I talk about the books that have been most influential to us.  This discussion brought up issues of suffering and being authentic with God, Christian's responsibility in changing culture, apologetics, and personal struggles.  We gave some thoughts on C.S. Lewis and Timothy Keller as well.

Listen to the episode here.

Books mentioned in the episode

To Change the World by James Davison Hunter

The Reason for God by Timothy Keller

A Sacred Sorrow by Michael Card

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 18

I interview Dr. Greg Ganssle on fittingness arguments for God's existence and God of the Gaps arguments.  We discuss what fittingness arguments are, what fittingness arguments there are for theism, what fittingness arguments there are for atheism, and Greg responds to the arguments for atheism.  We finish off by giving an analysis of "God of the Gaps" arguments and responding to the charge that arguments for theism are God of the Gaps arguments.

Listen to the audio here.

Sunday, July 15, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 17

Aaron and I talk more about abortion, focusing on some of its social issues and the issue of sexual responsibility.  We also talk about the Joe Rogan podcast and give our recommendations for Christians that he should invite onto his show for the purposes of opening him and his audience up to the intellectual viability of Christianity.

Edit: Around minute 6, Aaron means Casey vs. Planned Parenthood.

Listen to the episode here.

For the story about the two angels around J.P. Moreland, listen here.


Friday, July 13, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 16

Aaron and I discuss whether or not a sin like adultery should automatically mean that someone is not fit to be a leader of the country, why we named our podcast AK47, and some updates on future interviews.  Aaron also does a Woody Allen voice.

Listen to the episode here.

Thursday, July 12, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 15

I interview Becket Cook on his journey from a lifestyle of gay relationships and Hollywood glamour to a disciple of Christ.  He also gives his thoughts on the biblical exegesis of Matthew Vines and how to minister to gay people.

You'll hear some dogs barking in the background a bit near the beginning, but it doesn't last long and it doesn't overpower the dialogue.

Listen to the episode here.

For more Becket Cook, check out his website.

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 14

In this episode, I interview Dr. Chris Gadsden on religious epistemology and the rationality of theism and Christianity.  A lot of the things we talked about can be their own individual podcasts!

Listen to the episode here.

For more from Dr. Gadsden, check out his website, Ground Belief.

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 13

Aaron and I talk about sports, what defines a sport, whether or not sports are immoral, and I tell a cringy story and mess around.

Listen to the episode here.

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 12

Aaron and I discuss economic and cultural Marxism and discuss whether or not it is compatible with Christianity.  I also say "um" a lot and appear uneducated.

Check it out here.

Monday, July 9, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 11

Aaron and I interview Clinton Wilcox on abortion.  What are the arguments for the pro-life position?  Why should we listen to a man's opinion?  Do abortion laws affect abortion rates?  Are pro-lifers just pro-birth?  Does a woman's bodily autonomy justify abortion in some cases?  Listen to find out.

Listen to the interview here.

For more from Clinton Wilcox, check out his blog, his Twitter, and check out the Life Training Institute for more pro-life apologetics.

Sunday, July 8, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 10

In this episode, I interview Basil Polivka on his journey to Eastern Orthodoxy, where Eastern Orthodoxy came from, and the beliefs and practices of Eastern Orthodoxy.

Listen to the episode here.

Saturday, July 7, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 9

Aaron and I are back together to record.  We talk about our experiences studying philosophy in university and graduate school.  What were our universities like?  What is Talbot like?  Should you do it?  What are the benefits and risks of getting a formal education in philosophy?  Will Christian students in secular colleges encounter hostile professors if they take philosophy?  Will Biola and Talbot make you cry?  Check it out.

Listen to the podcast here.

Friday, July 6, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 8

Aaron didn't join us for this one, but don't worry.  I didn't leave him or lock him in the closet or anything.  We actually recorded one together earlier today, but that one isn't up yet.

Here is my interview with Adrian Urias on his journey from atheism to Protestant Christianity and then to Catholicism.  I also ask Adrian to respond to some basic Protestant objections to Catholicism.  Adrian's background is very interesting and involves issues like Marxism, Capitalism, Communism, freedom, equality, and other high-concept stuff.

Forgive some of my heavy breathing in the beginning of the interview.  It doesn't overpower the dialogue and it only last for a very short time, so don't worry too much about it.

I'm finally getting the hang of the editing software, so the transition from intro music to the actual talking is much smoother.

Listen to the interview here.

For more materials from Adrian, check out his blog.

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 7

Aaron, the 'A' of the 'AK', was not able to join us for his podcast, but in this episode I interview Dr. Neil Shenvi on the apparent conflict between Christianity and science.  We discuss whether or not secularism is rampant among scientists and the scientific "culture," the different conflicts between science and Christianity, and how a Christian can respond to those apparent conflicts.  Issues like evolution and the age of the earth are also brought up.

I'm still learning how to edit things, so the intro music still ends very suddenly, making it so that the transition from intro music to the actual discussion isn't very clean, but it's not a big problem and I'll learn.

Listen to the interview here on Anchor.

For more of Dr. Shenvi's materials, check out his website.

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 6

In this episode, Aaron and I have a discussion about public debates.  We discuss their structure, the issue or persuasiveness, and if Christians are way too "nice."

This is my (Kyle's) first time hosting and uploading a podcast, so I don't know how to add an intro or outro yet, so I'll need to figure that out as we go along.  Forgive the lack of music!

Listen to the episode here on Anchor.

Monday, July 2, 2018

Things I like: Part 2

In this series, I will recommend things that I happened to come across that I like.  That's about as simple as it gets.

Political Discourse in America

David French writes a good piece on the bad state of political discourse in America today.  People overreact to the smallest things, especially as people replace religious commitment to political commitment.  Political Overreaction is the New American Way.

The SJW

Nathan Robinson writes an interesting piece giving criticisms and concerns about the extreme leftists that are often pejoratively known as "Social Justice Warriors."  Nathan considers himself a leftist, but is critical of this more extreme group.  I don't agree with everything he says, but I find his post fair and balanced for the most part.

Slavery in the Bible

J. Warner Wallace, a cold-case detective and apologist, answers a question on the issue of slavery in the Bible, which is often used to undermine the moral legitimacy of the Bible.



Sunday, July 1, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 5

We've got four peeps on this episode. The Sound quality is still quite poor but better than last time. We're probably going to switch to Anchor completely sometime soon. In any case this episode is about singleness in the church. We've got Greg Webb back from an old ResistanceTV Episode. And a new friend who is an old friend for me. I hope you learn to hate him as much as I do! Just kidding...a little. When you hear Swearwolves cut in that's because we had to edit something out. A couple profanities and a couple names removed for the purpose of anonymity. Enjoy.

Here's the Episode

The Anchor AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 4

This is our first "short" form episode available on Anchor and hopefully available elsewhere (they're supposed to send it out through the web to get caught in the other podcatchers). I put short in " "s because it ended up being about 40 minutes. We talked James Gunn and civility and Trump and how conservatives are hypocrites and also how we're the only hope for everything. 

Check out the episode here

Check out my latest Medium Article (discussed in the episode) here

Saturday, June 30, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 3

So I've figured out what was causing the horrible breathing noise on the last podcast, but the bad news is I didn't figure it out until after this podcast. Essentially the recorder I was using was picking up my breathing. I switched back to my old method of recording with a headset and from here on out that noise should be gone. It is truly annoying and I tried to remove it but simply couldn't without reducing the rest of the sound quality even more than it already is. In any case this is another conversation with Jonathan Pruitt. It is a new one thankfully. I'm going to repost all the old ones from ResistanceTV also.

Check it out here

Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Video Game Addiction and Good Uses of Time

Gaming Addiction

There has been a lot of news about The World Health Organization's classification of excessive video gaming being an addiction or disorder.  Some of the links that I provide also give responses to the studies, saying that it is premature or that the research done on the subject is poor, so I am hesitant to believe the studies.  My goal here, however, is not to argue for or against the studies, but to talk about the thoughts this kind of study brought up in my mind when I heard about it.  Namely, I want to talk about video games and wise use of our time.  I will do this by talking about my own experience playing games.  This is mostly a personal story, but I hope it will be helpful to readers as well.

Time Well Spent

Here's a picture from my Steam account


This is showing the total number of hours that I have put into this game.  739 hours is roughly equivalent to a month of my life spent playing this game.  This doesn't necessarily mean that the World Health Organization's criteria for what count as video game addiction apply to me.  I do not neglect work or friendships because of video games, I do not spend several hours a day playing video games, and I have not experienced "withdrawal symptoms" when I get off of them.  These 739 hours are also spread out over a two or two and a half year span of time.

Despite this, I think it is clear that playing this game was not the best use of all of those 739 hours.  I can't help but imagine how I could have spent all of that time.  Imagine the kind of skill or strength I could have developed if I had spent 739 hours practicing something or exercising.  Imagine the expertise I could have in an academic subject if I would have spent those 739 hours reading and studying that subject.  Imagine the kind of job I could have if some of that time went to working towards a career.  There are things I could have done that wouldn't have just been beneficial or edifying for me, but also helpful for others as well.  Studying a particular subject can help make me a better apologist, making me more able to bless others by teaching.  I also could have spent a lot of that time volunteering for a charitable organization that helps people.  When I think back at the time I spent playing this game, I can't help but wonder what might be true of me now if I didn't use all of that time playing this game.

This doesn't mean that I think it is always bad to play video games.  There is nothing necessarily immoral about entertainment.  Video games also don't strike me as any more of a time waster than binge watching a T.V. show or spending a Saturday on a Lord of the Rings or Marvel movie marathon.  Despite this, I think a guy like me can learn how to exercise more wisdom in how he uses his time.

I strongly suspect that what is true of me is also true of others.  What do you think?  Do you feel the same as I do, or are you better at balancing entertainment with more productive uses of time?

Monday, June 25, 2018

Apologist Recommendation: Neil Shenvi

In this series, I will recommend certain scholars and apologists to our readers and listeners.  These are people that I believe are worth listening to because they are informed and give good arguments and insights into the subjects that they study, which helps intellectually equip Christians so that they can grow in their own faith and their outreach towards non-Christians.  I am not claiming that these scholars and apologists have everything correct, but I think they are intellectual powerhouses that we can learn much from.

Neil Shenvi

Neil Shenvi has his Ph.D in theoretical chemistry from UC-Berkeley and was a research scientist at Yale and Duke University before becoming a homeschooler for his kids.  When we look at most of the scientifically trained critics of Christianity like Dawkins, Krauss, Stenger, and others, Christians often rightly notice that their knowledge and credentials as scientists does not make them intellectual heavyweights when it comes to philosophy, ethics, religion, history, theology, or any other subject that connects to apologetics.  Scientists who are critics of Christianity often make very elementary blunders because they are simply not well educated or well read in philosophy, theology, biblical studies, or history.  Dr. Shenvi, however, is an exception when it comes to scientists.  Having read his articles and seen his extensive interactions on Facebook, I can say firsthand that this guy is well versed in philosophy, ethics, and biblical studies.  His intelligence, thoughtfulness, winsomeness, and his ability to engage in multiple subjects of inquiry make him a valuable resource to Christians.

His Website

His website is, of course, the best place to look at his content.  Neil Shenvi-Apologetics is where you can find his essays, book reviews, talks, notes, and more.

The Resurrection and the Bible

As I've stated, he is well read in subjects outside of science.  He has material on evidence for the resurrection of Jesus in multiple places.

Christianity and Science

Being a scientist, he is well qualified to talk about sciences connection with Christianity.  He has talks on quantum mechanics and miracles and science and religion that you can check out.

Social Justice

Lately, Dr. Shenvi has been putting most of his time into learning about critical theory and intersectionality and how they have become part of the modern social justice movement.  This is an important topic in cultural apologetics.  His conclusion is that critical theory is a worldview that, while getting some things right and having some usefulness, has significant incompatibilities with the Christian worldview.  These two articles are where you can get his introduction to the ideas of social justice and critical theory and their compatibility with Christianity.  You can find his reviews and analysis of the books, Race, Class, and Gender, and Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, as a good start, but he also has other book reviews on the subject to look at.  You can also check out his interview on the subject if you would rather listen.

This should get you started on his material.  My understanding is that he is also in the process of writing a book defending Christianity, but it is not out yet.  I think this guy should have more recognition for his contribution, so I hope this post contributes to that.


Friday, June 22, 2018

Things I Like: Part 1

In this series, I will recommend things that I happened to come across that I like.  That's about as simple as it gets.  While this sounds frivolous, I will focus on recommending things that I think will be informative and edifying to people.

Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath

Leah Remini is an actress that you may recognize in shows like King of Queens and others.  She was a long-time scientologist, but left the religion several years ago.  In this docuseries on Hulu, she interviews many people who have left scientology, exposing the abuses of the church and the controlling nature of the beliefs and structure of the church.  It is also an interesting look at the practices of scientology and how cults work.

Social Justice in Video Games

Troy Leavitt, a former video game developer, has an interesting series responding to a controversial feminist in video game culture named Anita Sarkeesian.  He has a series of videos responding to her claims that there is rampant sexism in the video game industry and criticizing the worldview and premises she holds that lead her to make the claims she makes.  Part one of his series can be found here.

Philip DeFranco

Philip DeFranco is a Youtuber who releases new 15-18 minute videos every weekday giving the news.  He covers anything from news regarding Youtube and youtubers to important world events and world politics.  He is a very fair and balanced person, he makes it known when he is giving the facts and when he is giving his opinion and he is often quick to correct himself if he makes a mistake.  I recommend him as an alternative news source.

I like these things and I hope you do too.  God bless.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 2

This is an actual new episode. Kyle and I had a phone conversation with my Dad on the book of Hebrews. I wanted to have it up for Father's day but clearly failed to do this. In any case I think you will benefit from this discussion because my Father is an expert on this particular Epistle. He has a Doctorate in Theology. He edited and contributed to this excellent anthology on the Puritans and also contributed the most interesting and I think correct view to this Four Views book on the Warning passages in Hebrews.

Here's the episode

Monday, June 18, 2018

Apologist Recommendation: Timothy McGrew

In this series, I will recommend certain scholars and apologists to our readers and listeners.  These are people that I believe are worth listening to because they are informed and give good arguments and insights into the subjects that they study, which helps intellectually equip Christians so that they can grow in their own faith and their outreach towards non-Christians.  I am not claiming that these scholars and apologists have everything correct, but I think they are intellectual powerhouses that we can learn much from.

Timothy McGrew

Timothy McGrew is a philosophy professor at Western Michigan University.  His philosophical specialties are epistemology, probability theory, logic, and the history and philosophy of science.  When it comes to Christian apologetics, he frequently speaks and writes on the meaning of "faith" and the possibility and actuality of miracles.  Don't let his credentials as a philosopher fool you, however, he is also very competent when it comes to biblical studies.  Dr. McGrew has spent years researching the reliability of the Bible and he has shared his knowledge in numerous talks and debates over the years.  In the next section, I will provide resources on the various topics McGrew has been involved in over the years.

Miracles

Dr. McGrew has said a lot over the years on the possibility and actuality of miracles and the rationality in believing miracles.  Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a fantastic source for learning philosophy, features Dr. McGrew's helpful article on miracles.  McGrew has given helpful talks on how to think about miracles and has participated in debates on the rationality of believing in miracles.  I also highly recommend this talk on the history of the discussion of miracles among philosophers over the centuries.  Many people make it seem like David Hume basically closed the issue of miracles, but Dr. McGrew shows that Hume has had his critics over the centuries.  Tim and his wife, Lydia, who is also a scholar, also have an article defending the resurrection of Jesus Christ in The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (chapter 11).

Faith

Many people claim that faith is believing without evidence.  Being a philosopher who regularly thinks of evidence and rationality, Dr. McGrew has spent a lot of time showing that faith is not against the evidence.  In Tom Gilson's book, True Reason, Dr. McGrew and Dr. David Marshall respond to the charge that faith is unevidential belief by giving a historical perspective on how faith was understood and defined by thinkers in the church (chapter 11).  McGrew has also debated the atheist Peter Boghossian, who wrote a book arguing that faith is an unreliable way of knowing things because it doesn't rely on evidence.

The Reliability of the Bible

My favorite stuff from Dr. McGrew is his material on the reliability of the Bible.  He has spent a lot of time researching the subject and has helped to resurface an old argument for the Bible's reliability that, while good, has been forgotten for some time.  Dr. McGrew has an excellent series responding to alleged historical errors and contradictions in the Gospels.  He has debated the well-known biblical critic, Bart Ehrman, on the reliability of the Gospels.  The most interesting thing that Dr. McGrew has brought back into the apologetic discussion is the issue of Undesigned Coincidences.  An undesigned coincidence occurs when two or more people give completely different details about the same event, but despite the details being different, they fit together and explain each other like pieces of a puzzle, which gives a full picture of the event.  Undesigned coincidences are marks of reliability and truthfulness because they are subtle and unlikely to be made up or planned by the group of people giving the details, but despite this, the details still fit together well.  The kicker is that these undesigned coincidences are found all over the Bible.  Tim McGrew has spoken extensively on these things, but it is actually his wife, Lydia McGrew, who has put the most work into bringing this argument for biblical reliability back.  Lydia's book, Hidden in Plain View, explains undesigned coincidences and details a massive number of them in the Bible.  You can also find a number of her posts on various undesigned coincidences in the blog, What's Wrong With the World.

The Existence of God

I have not seen Dr. McGrew talk as much about the arguments for God's existence, but he does have some material on it that I think is worth looking into.  Here is a talk by him giving three arguments for God's existence and answering questions and criticisms from people.

I hope Dr. McGrew's materials are helpful to you all.

Friday, June 15, 2018

The AK47 Podcast: Season 1 Episode 1

We are super excited to launch our new podcast. Unfortunately it is mostly an old episode from the Resistance TV days. We've got new content coming soon. Jonathan Pruitt and I just recorded one, and there's two hours on the book of Hebrews with Kyle and my Dad coming also. But until then I hope you enjoy this imperfect walk down memory lane.

Here is the first episode of The AK47 Podcast

Racial Reconciliation in the Church and the Methods and Worldviews Involved

This article was originally featured on ResistanceTV.
We live in a somewhat heated racial climate in America right now.  Because of perceived injustices towards racial minorities in America, people are more loudly and fervently calling for racial reconciliation, relational healing between races.  As Christians, we should be in full support of racial reconciliation because we are all made in the image of God and our faith in Christ brings us together into God’s family.  There are, however, a lot of bumps in the road.  What we often don’t realize is that people adopt different methods of racial reconciliation and that these methods are often based on different worldviews.  When a person who wants racial reconciliation doesn’t adopt a particularmethod of racial reconciliation or does not see the world in the exact way that some activists see it, that person is often condemned as a racist.  While I believe we as Christians should care about racial reconciliation, we need to be clear on what methods are being espoused and the underlying worldviews that influence those methods, otherwise we may unwittingly adopt beliefs that are incompatible with the faith and cause damage.  In the next section, I will give two different resources for Christians to read and explain them.  Christians need to be aware of the methods of racial reconciliation that are proposed and the worldviews that often influence those methods.
Methods
Dr. George Yancey, a sociologist at the University of North Texas, gives a speech at a church on four different methods of racial reconciliation, their pros and cons, and his own method of relational healing between races.  This talk is a condensed version of his book.  Dr. Yancey makes it clear that there are different methods of racial reconciliation that we see espoused in the West (colorblindness, white guilt, multiculturalism, etc.) and that, despite each of them having some positive aspects, they have some major problems too.  He suggests a method that he calls Mutual Responsibility.  When wanting to achieve a great good, it is good to realize that not all ways of achieving that great good are created equal.  We need to think clearly about the methods we are adopting and ought to adopt.
Thinking deeply and critically about methods is one thing, but the methods we adopt are often influenced by our worldviews.  That is where this next resource comes in.
Worldview
Dr. Neil Shenvi, a scientist at Duke University, in his post, A Long Review of Race, Class, and Gender, reviews a book about the inequalities found in society.  He gives the pros and cons of the book, but the most important thing is that he analyzes the philosophy that underlies the viewpoints of all the authors.  Neil reveals that the underlying viewpoint of all the authors in this anthology is critical theory and that critical theory is a worldview.  Neil says that critical theory “often functions as a worldview (that is, as a comprehensive, interpretive framework for understanding reality),” and that the beliefs expressed by the authors are “not a random assortment of disconnected beliefs. Instead, they form a unified, coherent framework for viewing everything about our lives, from our identity, to our fundamental problem (oppression), to our fundamental moral duty (fighting for liberation), to the basis for unity between individuals (common oppression/solidarity).”  The problem with the worldview of critical theory, argues Neil, is that it is incompatible with Christianity in very important and fundamental ways. Many Christians do not realize that some or all of their viewpoints on race and racial reconciliation are based on a worldview that is not compatible with their Christianity.  It is important for Christians to think deeply about their worldview and the worldviews of others so that they can see how they are being affected by the world.  Racial reconciliation is important, but if Neil is right, we should not unwittingly adopt beliefs about racial reconciliation that are based on an incompatible worldview, or at the very least, we shouldn’t adopt those beliefs for the same reasons.  It can affect our faith and our actions.
I hope and pray that these two resources will help people think clearly about this issue and that clear thinking can aid us in finding a good, biblical solution.

Abortion and the Death Penalty

This article was originally featured on ResistanceTV.

I recently published a post on Twitter and Facebook that went something like this:

People often claim that pro-lifers are being inconsistent for being against abortion, but supportive of the death penalty.  Not everyone who is against abortion is for the death penalty, of course, but some are.  It is not clear to me, however, what the inconsistency is, because people usually don't explain what it is.  Here is my best attempt at two propositions that anti-abortion, pro-death penalty people believe:
1. It is never justified to take the life of a human being that is innocent of any wrongdoing.
2. It is sometimes justified to take the life of a human being that is guilty of wrongdoing. 
What, exactly, is inconsistent about believing these two propositions?  Keep in mind that I'm not asking if (1) or (2) are true, I'm asking what is inconsistent about believing them both.
I posted this because I frequently see people accuse pro-lifers of being inconsistent in being against abortion, but in favor of the death penalty.  This objection can come from pro-choice people who want to criticize pro-lifers for being hypocrites and it can come from pro-lifers who believe that the “pro-life” label can only apply to people who are against both abortion and the death penalty.
It is not clear to me what the inconsistency is, so I posted this tweet to see what people would say.  I was not asking if the anti-abortion or pro-death penalty viewpoints were right or true.  I was asking if a person is being intellectually inconsistent by being anti-abortion and pro-death penalty.  I am also aware that not all people who are anti-abortion are pro-death penalty.  The question is whether or not those who are both anti-abortion and pro-death penalty are being intellectually inconsistent .  I didn’t get any conversation going on Twitter (I still have a very small following), but I got a lot of interaction on Facebook.  There was a big discussion, but the best answer came from a Catholic philosopher named Ron Belgau, who writes for a blog called Spiritual Friendship.  With his permission, I decided to share his response here.
Are pro-lifers who support the death penalty morally inconsistent? In order to answer this question, it’s important to consider alternate ways of understanding the right to life and the nature of personhood.
A. Regarding life:
1. One view would be that the life of a human person is always sacred, and that it is always wrong to intentionally kill a person.
2. Another view would be that it is always wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human person, but that in certain circumstances–war, or the punishment for very serious crimes, for example–a person forfeits their right to life, and may be killed in order to protect the right to life of other innocent human persons.
B. Regarding persons:
1. One view would be that every human being is a human person from the moment of conception; that is, that they are a person simply because they are a human being.
2. The other view would be that personhood requires something more–a certain kind of self-consciousness that is typical of normally functioning adult human beings. On this view, certain human beings are not human persons, or are only “marginal persons,” and so are not protected by either version of the principle about the sanctity of human life.
A person who holds both A1 and B1 would oppose abortion and the death penalty. Holding A1 and B2 would entail opposition to the death penalty but could permit abortion; and holding A2 and B1 would entail opposition to abortion but could permit the death penalty. Holding both A2 and B2 could permit both. In other words, B1 is the essential conviction for pro-lifers, while A1 is the essential conviction for those who oppose the death penalty. In order for it to be logically inconsistent for pro-lifers to support the death penalty, it would have to be logically inconsistent to accept B1 and also accept A2. Or, to put it another way, accepting B1 would have to logically entail accepting A1. I do not see why it would be logically inconsistent for someone who supports B1 to accept A2; but at the very least, if opponents of the death penalty want to argue that pro-lifers are logically inconsistent, they need to show why the belief that life begins at conception is logically inconsistent with the belief that societies can kill in extreme circumstances to protect themselves from those who are a serious threat to the lives of others
Side Note: When I say that A2 could permit capital punishment, and B2 could permit abortion, I do not mean that they must do so. Consider A2 and the death penalty. To say that people may be killed to protect society against war or murder is not to say that they must be killed. It only means that if there is no other way to defend life except to kill those who threaten it, then killing them is permitted. But if there are non-lethal methods of protecting society from war or murder, these are preferable. In a society with a relatively low level of social development, it may be a serious burden to keep criminals locked up, and may be difficult to establish jails secure enough to protect against escape. So I think such a society could be justified in executing murderers after a serious effort at verifying guilt. But in an advanced society like the United States, it may be possible to adequately protect society without putting murderers to death. In which case, A2 may not provide an adequate justification for the death penalty. Nevertheless, if an unborn child is a person (B1), then A2 provides a much stronger reason for opposing abortion than for opposing the death penalty, because the child is innocent and is not threatening anyone; therefore, killing it cannot be self-defense in the same way that killing can protect society from war and murder. (This principle might be used to authorize abortion in cases where continuing the pregnancy directly threatens the life of the mother.)
I hope Ron’s response helps everyone think through the logic or this issue.

Ambiguity, Context, and Biblical Interpretation

This article was originally featured on ResistanceTV.
Definitions in Context
The SAT is a standardized test that many students have to take.  One type of question in the reading section is called a vocabulary in context question.  These questions will ask the reader what a particular word in the passage “most nearly” means and it will provide four different answers to choose from.  The tricky thing about these types of questions is that, often times, all four options are legitimate definitions of the word in question.  To know which meaning of the word is being used in the passage, the reader has to read the context that the word is in, usually by reading a few lines or even an entire paragraph of the passage.  Only by looking at the context can the reader figure out which of the answer choices provides the correct meaning of the word in that passage.  Context is important in everyday life too.  If you walk into a room and hear me say “I killed that guy” to a friend, that may sound like I committed a crime.  However, if you heard the whole context, you would know that I’m talking about a video game I played earlier.  By “kill” I didn’t mean “murder,” I meant that I took out the avatar that he was controlling.  The phrase takes on a whole new meaning in your mind when you learn the context.  Context is also important when it comes to the Bible.  As many people have pointed out when teaching hermeneutics (the art and skill of proper interpretation), one must know the context of a word or verse in the Bible to really understand it.  This helps with apologetics and our personal devotions.
Context in the Bible: Apologetic Usefulness
This graphic claims to show all of the contradictions in the Bible. Here are two verses that contradict each other according to this graphic.
Have you not known? Have you not heard?
The Lord is the everlasting God,
the Creator of the ends of the earth.
He does not faint or grow weary;
his understanding is unsearchable.
(Isaiah 40:28)
Your new moons and your appointed feasts
my soul hates;
they have become a burden to me;
I am weary of bearing them.
(Isaiah 1:14)
One verse says that God does not get weary.  The other one says that God is weary.  Is this a contradiction?
If we pretend that these passages are in an SAT test and it asks us “What does the word ‘weary’ most nearly mean in the passage?” what would the right answers be?  If, in both cases, “weary” means “fatigued,” then we do have a contradiction.  However, it is clear that “weary” is being used in different senses in each passage.  In Isaiah 40, it is saying that God does not get physically tired.  We can tell this because the next few verses say
He gives power to the faint,
and to him who has no might he increases strength.
Even youths shall faint and be weary,
and young men shall fall exhausted;
but they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength;
they shall mount up with wings like eagles;
they shall run and not be weary;
they shall walk and not faint.
In Isaiah 1, when God says He’s “weary” of bearing Israel’s religious festivals, He most nearly means that He cannot tolerate them.  The popular English phrase “sick and tired of” fits best in this passage.  This becomes clear when we look at verses 11-13
“What to me is the multitude of your sacrifices?
says the Lord;
I have had enough of burnt offerings of rams
and the fat of well-fed beasts;
do not delight in the blood of bulls,
or of lambs, or of goats.
“When you come to appear before me,
who has required of you
this trampling of my courts?
Bring no more vain offerings;
incense is an abomination to me.
New moon and Sabbath and the calling of convocations—
I cannot endure iniquity and solemn assembly.
Can you imagine how embarrassing it would be if, say, an atheist used the two verses above as an example of a contradiction in the Bible when just reading a couple of verses of context reveals that there is no contradiction?  That is exactly what the graphic does.  How many more mistakes does it make?
Context in the Bible: Devotional Usefulness
There are many verses in the Bible that people use for inspiration and knowledge of God, but they may be using them incorrectly.  For example, Philippians 4:13 says “I can do all things through him who strengthens me.”  People often think this verse means that God will help them accomplish any goal as long as they have enough faith, like win a football game or get the girl.  However, this verse is talking about something else.  Look at the context
I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at length you have revived your concern for me.  You were indeed concerned for me, but you had no opportunity.  Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content.  I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound.  In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need.  I can do all things through him who strengthens me. (v. 10-13)
When we look at the context, we see that v. 13 has less to do with God helping us accomplish goals and more to do with God helping us through whatever situation we are in, whether that situation is joyful or tough.  This verse is still just as inspirational and comforting when we know the context, but our inspiration and comfort is based on the truth of what the passage says instead of a misunderstanding and it gives us more accurate knowledge of God.
Context is Key
The chapter and verse divisions in our modern Bibles are very helpful for us because they allow us to find content easily.  The drawback, however, is that people tend to isolate each verse from their contexts.  Issues like this are why the popular apologist, Greg Koukl of Stand to Reason, say “Never read a Bible verse.”  This provocative-sounding phrase tells an important hermeneutical truth: one should never simply read a verse of the Bible if they want to know what it means, they should at least read a paragraph in order to understand it.  Context helps illuminate meaning.
The lesson here is clear: If you want to understand the Bible, do not just read each verse in isolation.  Reading chunks of the Bible instead of individual verses is one of the most important and simplest rules in hermeneutics.  Recognize that everything that is said in the Bible is part of a whole and understanding context can help clear up ambiguities.