Aaron and I are going to focus on less politically, socially, and philosophically heavy things in the rest of the episodes this year. It's break time, so we want to take it easy. That doesn't mean those topics won't come out of our mouths though.
Aaron and I are all over the place in this episode. We talk about the Aquaman movie, which Aaron recently watched, superhero movies in general, the Gospel, some apologetics, our thoughts on Ben Shapiro's interview with John MacArthur, stuff about the spiritual vs. the psychological, and more.
Listen to the episode here.
If you are interested in supporting our show, find out how here.
This is not about guns. Aaron and Kyle doing podcast commentary on culture, philosophy, politics, and theology AT LEAST 47 times a year.
Showing posts with label civility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civility. Show all posts
Sunday, December 23, 2018
The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 41
Labels:
apologetics,
Christianity,
civility,
conversion,
culture,
culture change,
culture making,
entertainment,
ethics,
fiction,
film,
Gospel,
history,
Hollywood,
movies,
psychology
Tuesday, September 11, 2018
What is the Point of Debating Online?
I came across this picture on FB that I think makes a very good point.
Earlier this year, I was debating abortion with some people on my FB page and I was in several other debates on that topic over the period of a couple of months. During that time many people have said to me that we should just ignore pro-choice commenters, especially ones that are more emotional and do not give cogent arguments. They won't be convinced, so what's the point debating them? Not everybody says this, but it is something I hear relatively often. Sometimes, you hear cynical people in any controversial discussion say "What is the point in arguing about this?! No one is going to change their mind!"
I definitely understand that issue. It is very unlikely that they will be convinced by any arguments we give on this platform. In my experience, they often just repeat the same things over and over again without considering what my pro-life friends or I argue. I do, however, think that entering these debates with pro-choicers on FB is a worthwhile endeavor. I don't necessarily enter these debates to convince these people, though it would be nice if they were convinced. Here is why I engage them
1) It may at least help them understand why people are pro-life beyond "You just want to control women's bodies!"
2) It may help them become pro-life ten years from now.
3) It helps a brother out. If a friend of mine is debating the abortion issue with multiple people, I don't want to leave him alone. I want to help him out. I also appreciate it if people help me out and don't leave me alone.
4) I don't want these people to be so confident in their assertions. I don't want them to get away with saying what they want without being challenged.
5) The audience may be genuinely helped and educated by seeing your contribution to the debate.
2) It may help them become pro-life ten years from now.
3) It helps a brother out. If a friend of mine is debating the abortion issue with multiple people, I don't want to leave him alone. I want to help him out. I also appreciate it if people help me out and don't leave me alone.
4) I don't want these people to be so confident in their assertions. I don't want them to get away with saying what they want without being challenged.
5) The audience may be genuinely helped and educated by seeing your contribution to the debate.
I'm not saying that all pro-choicers are bad arguers or closed-minded. I am also not saying that there aren't legitimate times avoid engaging with some people. I just don't like the categorical charge that engaging them is always pointless because they won't be convinced. This doesn't just go for the abortion debate. This applies to any topic of debate online.
Labels:
abortion,
apologetics,
argument,
civility,
clarity,
critical thinking,
debate,
discussion,
logic
Sunday, July 29, 2018
The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 23
Adrian Urias returns to talk about a feminist philosophy class that he took in college. What is feminism? What are the philosophical presuppositions of feminism? How do we engage with feminists? What about feminism is compatible with Christianity? What parts aren't compatible? All that and more here.
Listen to the episode here.
Listen to my first interview with Adrian here.
For more from Adrian, check out his blog.
Listen to the episode here.
Listen to my first interview with Adrian here.
For more from Adrian, check out his blog.
Labels:
Christianity,
civility,
culture,
feminism,
metaphysics,
methodology,
persuasion,
persuasiveness,
sex,
SJW,
social justice
Thursday, July 19, 2018
The AK47 Podcast Season 1: Episode 20
Aaron and I talk about a dialogue that happened between Pastor Timothy Keller and Dr. Jonathan Haidt called The Closing of the Modern Mind. Keller and Haidt talk about living in a pluralistic society and what resources their viewpoints have to offer to help people live in and foster a pluralistic society. Aaron and I talk about the issue of civility when living around and talking with different people, the strengths Keller has as a speaker and representative of Christ, and the problems with identity politics.
Listen to the episode here.
This is the article Aaron mentions about Jim Jefferies and Jordan Peterson
Listen to the episode here.
This is the article Aaron mentions about Jim Jefferies and Jordan Peterson
Labels:
civility,
critical thinking,
culture,
debate,
discussion,
identity politics,
intersectionality,
Jordan Peterson,
logic,
pluralism,
politics,
psychology,
reason,
Timothy Keller
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
